🧠Psychologically Neutered: Why The Men You Know Have No Fight In Them (The Fall of The Omega Negative Minus Males)

Androphobia is defined as the dread of men or repugnance to the male sex:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/androphobia

Heterophobia is defined as the irrational fear, aversion to, or discrimination against heterosexuals:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/heterophobia

Those words are not exclusively applied to the homotran (the lgbt) because the “straight” people that support them are also androphobic and heterophobic.

What is the substantiation of that claim?

REALITY.

It is impossible to support heterosexuality with homosexuality because homosexuality is adversarial to heterosexuality by default… heterosexual people don’t like gay shit and gay MFs do not like heterosexuality. That is fundamentally adversarial and can be no other way. This is why the impact of homosexuality on society is ALWAYS destructive. Thus, any support of the homotran by any heterosexual person is also destructive. Anybody that claims otherwise is not able to substantiate the lies they believe and will never be able to do so because only reality can be substantiated.

If the men in your family or community are docile, timid, obsequious, subservient to women, political, and always seeking to avoid a fight when it is time to fight, THAT MAN OR THOSE MEN CANNOT AND WILL NOT PROTECT YOU WHEN THE CONDITION OR SITUATION REQUIRES IT.

Politically Correct/Nice/Kind men are incapable of doing what needs to be done, when it needs to be done. They will not fight in any way that is necessary because they are afraid to offend anyone.

Men with low-testosterone is common and the amount of testosterone in most men is rapidly decreasing. This is why you see more men that are “in touch with their feminine side”, but ignore the reality that there is nothing feminine about anything that is truly masculine. It does not matter how low a man’s testosterone is because testosterone is not any man’s mind.

Feminine behavior in any man is EPICENE at best and homomentality at the worst. The homomental male does not do the shit dick thing (gay sex), but they allow, like, and tolerate everything else that is gay, even befriending gay people or being an “ally” in the homotran war against order, life, and living. The homomental male will say things like “I don’t have a problem with it”, which is an indication and admission of homomentality, or the homomental male will say something like “they are not messing with anybody”, which is a complete lie given the OUTCOME of the efforts, activities, and behavior of the homotran (lgbt) over the past 30 years up to RIGHT NOW.

These epicene, homomental, weak, and timid males of any age are what I refer to as Omega Negative Minus Males. They are weaker than the “Beta Male” and can never be an “Alpha Male” but, furthermore, they are androphobic in their support for heterophobia. DO NOT BE FOOLED!!! HOMOSEXUALITY IS HETEROPHOBIA, but the Vanar is extremely MENDACIOUS and INTRANSIGENT, and because of that, most people don’t know that the words “heterosexuality” and “homosexuality” are TRANS-WORDS. A TRANS-WORD is what I call any ILLUSIONARY word that is used to conceal or diminish perception of what is truly there, and what is truly there is ALWAYS the root word, if they Vanar is using the academically established word in proper context.

To clarify, the word SEX originated BEFORE the words “heterosexual” and “homosexual”.

The words, “heterosexual” and “homosexual” were both coined and introduced in 1892 by Richard von Krafft-Ebing. Before that time, “homosexuality” was referred to as “Sexual Inversion”, which is what it is.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/homosexual#etymonline_v_12134

https://www.etymonline.com/word/heterosexual#etymonline_v_9213

The Vanar says there is no way to determine if Richard von Krafft-Ebing was a homotran (gay) because it was never admitted by him, he was married with 4 children, and any openly gay behavior would have him shunned by society at the time. So, how can anyone know for certain if Richard von Krafft-Ebing was gay? Nobody can. But, what can be SHOWN for certain RIGHT NOW is the OUTCOME of what Richard von Krafft-Ebing did in introducing and popularizing the words “heterosexual” and “homosexual”. We all see what the outcome is RIGHT NOW. It’s all across the media and it is going on around you. The mind produces what the mind requires. Richard von Krafft-Ebing was a HOMOMENTAL and his work only served the interests of the homotran (lgbt), having no benefit for heterosexuality. People have a sex, either male or female, and the word sex includes and describes both the male and female.

Now, allow me to show the trick the Vanar has played with these words:

The prefix “homo-”, which from latin, means “human”: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/homo

I just substantiated how the word “sex” has been and is inclusive for describing both males and females. When Richard von Krafft-Ebing coined the words “homosexual” and “heterosexual”, he knew EXACTLY what he was doing. By coining "homosexual" and "heterosexual," Krafft-Ebing sought to apply a clinical, neutral approach to sexual orientation. However, "Psychopathia Sexualis", written by him, was very much a product of its time, and the book pathologized many sexual behaviors, as the word "psychopathia" implies a pathology. Over time, his work contributed to growing discussions around sexual behavior, which eventually led to the DEMEDICALIZATION and DEPATHOLOGIZATION of homosexuality in the later 20th century with the development of more “modern and inclusive” (mendacious and intransigent) perspectives on human sexuality. In summary, the outcome of Richard von Krafft-Ebing’s work resulted in crazy people being regarded as sane TODAY. How is that serving you and the society you live in RIGHT NOW? What is the impact of treating insane people as if they are sane? I didn’t lie to you. So,don’t lie to yourself in answering that question. I know reality. Nobody can fool me. Don’t fool yourself.

You must be careful and guard your mind. There is still much more you do not know and I am not done.

Diez Mansour-Dehghan

The .:Atenubi:Taharakhti:.